Legal Opinion

Stimson Mill Co. v. United States

District Court, W.D. Washington

Decided November 18, 1935No. 20970Published

1Opinion of the Court

BOWEN, District Judge.

This is an action at law to recover a money judgment for breach of contracts of sale of lumber. It is now before the court on plaintiff’s motion for default, based on defendant’s failure to plead within the non-extensible time therefor provided by this court’s rule 81.

The pertinent parts of that rule provide: “When an act to be done in any action at law * * * relates to the pleadings in the cause, * * * the time allowed by these rules may, unless otherwise specially provided, be extended by the Court or Judge by order made before the expiration of such time; but no such…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Agricultural & Livestock Credit Corp. v. McKenzieWashington Supreme Court · 1930
  2. Jacobsen v. Defiance Lumber Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1927
  3. Eley v. GambleCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1935
  4. Mason v. McLeanWashington Supreme Court · 1893
  5. Freeborn v. Chewelah Copper King Mining Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1916

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API