Sacks v. Loew's Theatres, Inc.
New York Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtNicholas M. Pette, J.
Defendant Cavalcade Tours, Inc. (hereinafter: Cavalcade) moves for judgment dismissing the amended complaint and the causes of action alleged therein as against it, pursuant to CPLR 3211 (subd. [a], par. 7), upon the alleged ground that said amended complaint fails to state *855a cause of action on the face thereof as against said defendant Cavalcade.
Loew’s Theatres, Inc. (hereinafter: Loew’s), Maurer Tours, Inc. (hereinafter: Maurer), Cavalcade and Hotel Americana of Puerto Rico, Inc. (hereinafter: Americana) are all corporations. The amended complaint contains several alleged causes of action…
2Cited by8 opinions
- Rusyniak v. GensiniDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 2009
- Dorkin v. American Express Co.New York Supreme Court · 1973
- Garcia v. Herald Tribune Fresh Air Fund, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1976
- Josephs v. Fuller (Club Dominicus)New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1982
- Carley v. Theater Development FundDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1998
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.