Legal Opinion · Concurring in part, dissenting in part

Leschi Improvement Council v. Washington State Highway Commission

Washington Supreme Court

Decided December 10, 1974No. 42766Published

1Concurring in part, dissenting in partRosellini, J.

(concurring in part; dissenting in part) — I heartily concur with the last paragraph of the majority opinion. Since the appellants in this action introduced no evidence whatsoever upon the question of the adequacy of the respondents’ environmental impact statement, but relied entirely on a federal district court judge’s finding in another action involving another segment of the highway,5 we would be perverse indeed were we to say that the evidence does not support the trial court’s finding.

I also agree that the protection of man’s environment is a matter of great and proper public concern,…

2Cases cited42 opinions

  1. San Antonio Independent School District v. RodriguezSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  2. Sierra Club v. MortonSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  3. National Ass'n for the Advancement of Colored People v. ButtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  4. Shapiro v. ThompsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  5. United States v. Students Challenging Regulatory Agency Procedures (SCRAP)Supreme Court of the United States · 1973

37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API