Legal Opinion
Worth Savings Bank v. Foster
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided August 3, 1928No. 26,799PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Per curiam
Appeal by defendant from an order denying his motion for a new trial.
All questions raised by this appeal are disposed of by the opinion in the case of Olsen v. Hoffmann, 175 Minn. 287, 221 N. W. 10. The fact that the notes were indorsed by the payee “without recourse,” does not indicate bad faith. Collins v. McDowell, 65 Minn. 110, 67 N. W. 845; Park v. Hudson, 154 Minn. 471, 479, 192 N. W. 112.
Order affirmed.
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Olsen v. HoffmannSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1928
- Collins v. McDowellSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1896
- Park v. HudsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1923
3Cited by1 opinion
- Eastern Acceptance Corp. v. KavlickNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1950