Legal Opinion

Taher Alhorsome v. Macias, et al.

District Court, E.D. California

Decided August 6, 2026No. 1:26-cv-05758Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 TAHER ALHORSOME, Case No. 1:26-cv-05758-JLT-EPG 12 Plaintiff, ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE AS TO WHY THIS CASE SHOULD NOT BE DISMISSED 13 v. FOR (1) LACK OF SUBJECT MATTER JURISDICTION AND (2) ABSTENTION 14 MACIAS, et al., UNDER YOUNGER AND ROOKER- FELDMAN 15 Defendants. (ECF No. 1) 16 17 18 I. INTRODUCTION 19 Plaintiff Taher Alhorsome is proceeding pro se in this civil action filed on July 24, 2026. 20 (ECF No. 1). Plaintiff generally alleges that defendants made fraudulent claims about Plaintiff’s bank account…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Younger v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  2. Kokkonen v. Guardian Life Insurance Co. of AmericaSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  3. Caterpillar Inc. v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  4. Arbaugh v. Y & H Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 2006
  5. District of Columbia Court of Appeals v. FeldmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1983

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API