Legal Opinion
Roubideaux v. North Dakota Department of Corrections & Rehabilitation
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
Decided July 2, 2009No. 07-3780PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HANSEN, Circuit Judge.
Two North Dakota prison inmates, Julie Roubideaux and Shelly Grossman, representing a certified class of female inmates (collectively “the Female Inmates”), brought this sex discrimination suit pursu ant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 and Title IX of the Education Amendments of 1972, see 20 U.S.C. § 1681(a), alleging, among other things, that from 1997 to the present, the North Dakota prison system has provided them with unequal programs and facilities as compared to the male inmates. The district court granted summary judgment in favor of the defendants. See Roubideaux v. N.D.…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- City of Cleburne v. Cleburne Living Center, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Turner v. SafleySupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- United States v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Jane Doe v. Mercy Catholic Medical CenterCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2017
- Colbert Ex Rel. Colbert v. District of ColumbiaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2015
- Roubideaux v. ND DEPT. OF CORRECTIONS AND REHAB.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2009
- Castro v. Yale UniversityDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2021
- Glaser v. Upright Citizens Brigade LLCDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2020