Legal Opinion · Dissent

United States v. Gilbert Brito

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided August 22, 2017No. 15-30229Published

1DissentMcKEOWN, Circuit Judge

The key issue in this appeal is whether the phrase “term of imprisonment” in 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) and the federal Sentencing Guidelines includes time already served in state custody such that the court is not bound by the guideline minimum. The majority says yes, but I respectfully dissent. The statute relates to reduction of an original sentence based on retroactive changes to the Guidelines. However, the Guidelines affirmatively prohibit reducing the “term of imprisonment” below the lower end of the' amended guideline range.1 The majority offers no precedent on this “term of imprisonment”…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Willie TURNIPSEED, Defendant-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1998
  2. United States v. Anthony Scott DrakeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1995
  3. United States v. Teniah TerceroCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2013
  4. United States v. CruzCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2010
  5. United States v. Edmund Davis, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2014

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API