Legal Opinion
Boursiquot v. Citibank F.A.B.
District Court, D. Connecticut
Decided July 1, 2004No. CIV.A. 303CV1914SRUPublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
RULING ON MOTION TO DISMISS
UNDERHILL, District Judge.
Jean and Leone Boursiquot (“the Bour-siquots”) allege violations of the Truth in Lending Act (“TILA”), 15 U.S.C. § 1601 et seq-., and the Connecticut Unfair Trade Practices Act (“CUTPA”), Conn. Gen.Stat. § 42-110a et seq., arising out of a consumer loan transaction with the - defendant, Citibank. Citibank now moves to-dismiss the Boursiquots’ claims based on the expiration of the statute of limitation on the TILA claims, and federal preemption of the CUTPA claims. For the following reasons the motion to dismiss is granted.
I. FACTS
For…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Papasan v. AllainSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Hishon v. King & SpaldingSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Fidelity Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n v. De La CuestaSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Pacific Gas & Electric Co. v. State Energy Resources Conservation & Development CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Ryder Energy Distribution Corporation v. Merrill Lynch Commodities Inc., E.F. Hutton & Co., Inc., and New York Mercantile ExchangeCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1984
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- McCurry v. Chevy Chase Bank, FSBWashington Supreme Court · 2010
- McCurry v. Chevy Chase Bank, FSBWashington Supreme Court · 2010
- Casey v. Federal Deposit InsuranceCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2009
- Guadagno v. E Trade BankDistrict Court, C.D. California · 2008
- Reyes v. Downey Savings and Loan Ass'n, FADistrict Court, C.D. California · 2008
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.