Legal Opinion

Roye v. Borough of Columbia

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided May 31, 1899No. Appeal, No. 230PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Appeal, No. 230, Jan. T., 1899, by plaintiff, from decree of C. P. Lancaster Co., Equity Docket, No. 3, page 261, dismissing injunction. Hearing on bill and answer.

Read the full summary

Appeal, No. 230, Jan. T., 1899, by plaintiff, from decree of C. P. Lancaster Co., Equity Docket, No. 3, page 261, dismissing injunction. Hearing on bill and answer. Before Livingston, P. J. It appears from the record that the borough of Columbia was incorporated under the Act of April 16, 1866, P. L. 920 ; that its debt, incurred in the ordinary business improvement of the city, amounted to $171,000, for which bonds of the said borough are outstanding, including notes of $12,100; that the aggregate debt of the borough exceeded two per cent of the assessed valuation for which it was proposed…

1Opinion of the Court

Pee Cueiam,

We find no error in the decree from which this appeal was taken. The decree is affirmed on the opinion of the learned president of the court below, and appeal dismissed at appellant’s costs. v

2Cited by2 opinions

  1. Bell v. BoroughSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1900
  2. Pittsburgh Paving Co. v. PittsburghSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1938

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API