Goss v. Richmond

Plaintiffs appeal as of right the granting of summary judgment, GCR 1963, 117.2(3), to defendant Le-Rob Corporation in a dramshop action, MCL 436.22; MSA 18.993. Since the claims of Arthur Goss and Mary Goss were derivative from the claim of Arthur Goss, Jr., we use the word plaintiff in the singular to refer only to Arthur Jr.’s claim.

Plaintiff alleged in his dramshop action that defendant Le-Rob, a licensed seller of alcoholic beverages, illegally sold intoxicating liquor to a visibly intoxicated person, defendant Robert Richmond. Richmond allegedly drove his automobile off the road and…