Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

Tanksley v. ProSoft Automation, Inc.

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided June 1, 2007No. 1050099PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

[EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.]

Robert L. Tanksley, the plaintiff below, appeals from summary judgments entered in favor of the defendants, Rockwell Automation, Inc. ("Rockwell"), Danieli Corporation ("Danieli"), ProSoft Automation, Inc. ("ProSoft Automation"), and PROSOFT, Inc. (collectively "the defendants"), in this action seeking damages for injuries sustained in an industrial accident. We affirm.

Facts and Procedural History

Tanksley worked as a welder at a steel mill operated by United…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. West v. Founders Life Assur. Co. of FloridaSupreme Court of Alabama · 1989
  3. Bass v. SOUTHTRUST BANK OF BALDWIN CTY.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1989
  4. Bussey v. John Deere Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1988
  5. Casrell v. Altec Industries, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1976

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Marek v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 2009
  2. Roberts v. NASCO EQUIPMENT CO., INC.Supreme Court of Alabama · 2007
  3. McGough v. G & A, INC.Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2007
  4. Morgan v. Bill Vann Co.District Court, S.D. Alabama · 2013
  5. Barrett v. Radjabi-MougadamSupreme Court of Alabama · 2009

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API