Legal Opinion
Exterior Systems, Inc. v. Noble Composites, Inc.
District Court, N.D. Indiana
Decided June 24, 2002No. 3:01-cv-00217PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
NUECHTERLEIN, United States Magistrate Judge.
On March 28, 2002, five months after his previous counsel was disqualified for violating conflict of interest rules, Defendant Edward Welter’s new counsel filed a Motion to Disqualify the opponent’s counsel [Doc. No. 179], The instant motion lacks merit and is DENIED. 1
I. FACTUAL BACKGROUND
On December 4, 2001, this Court disqualified Welter’s previous counsel, Cynthia Gillard and her firm Warrick & Boyn. Exterior Systems, Inc. v. Noble Composites, Inc., 175 F.Supp.2d 1112 (N.D.Ind.2001). The” Court assumes the reader’s…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Alfred B. Freeman v. Chicago Musical Instrument Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1982
- Silver Chrysler Plymouth, Inc. v. Chrysler Motors Corporation and Chrysler Realty CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1975
- Analytica, Incorporated v. Npd Research, Inc., Defendant-Cross-Appellant-Cross-Appellee. Appeals of Schwartz & Freeman and Pressman and Hartunian ChtdCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1983
- Lasalle National Bank and Lake Properties Venture v. County of Lake and the Village of GrayslakeCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1983
- Westinghouse Electric Corporation v. Gulf Oil Corporation, and United Nuclear CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1978
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Attorney Grievance Commission v. SiskindCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2007