Legal Opinion

Beall v. Morgantown & Kingwood Railroad

West Virginia Supreme Court

Decided October 22, 1935No. CC 534PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Woods, Judge:

This certificate involves the sufficiency of an amended declaration, four special pleas and two special replications, the trial court having overruled demurrers to the amended declaration, the special plea of “want of authority of agent to execute and failure of defendant to ratify contract,” and the two special replications to said plea, and having sustained demurrers to the special pleas of “accord and satisfaction,” “conditions performed and conditions unbroken,” and ‘ ‘ release. ’ ’

This action is based on an alleged breach on the part of defendant company of a promise to…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Carroll-Cross Coal Co. v. Abrams Creek Coal & Coke Co.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1919
  2. James v. AdamsWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1880
  3. Kelly Convertible Wagon Co. v. Rhodes Manufacturing Co.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1926
  4. Pedicord v. Elm Grove Mining Co.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1931
  5. Moseley v. JonesSupreme Court of Virginia · 1816

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Wright v. Standard Ultramarine and Color Co.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1955
  2. Bernard J. Lee, Platiff-Appellant v. Jenkins Brothers, Bernard J. Lee v. Farnham YardleyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1959
  3. National Union Life Insurance Company v. IngramSupreme Court of Alabama · 1963
  4. Beall v. Morgantown & Kingwood RailroadWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1937
  5. Magruder v. Hagen-Ratcliff & Co.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1948

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API