Kwan Fong Fung v. New York City Housing Authority
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
The determination that petitioners did not qualify as remaining family members for purposes of succession rights to the subject apartment has a rational basis. The evidence shows that *453petitioner Kwan Fong Fung did not become an authorized occupant of her father’s apartment prior to his death in 2009 (see Matter of Valentin v New York City Hous. Auth., 72 AD3d 486 [1st Dept 2010]).
Contrary to petitioners’ contention, respondent did not implicitly approve of their residence in the subject apartment. A governmental agency cannot be estopped from discharging its statutory duties when a claimant…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Featherstone v. FrancoNew York Court of Appeals · 2000
- In the Matter of Schorr v. New York City Department of Housing Preservation and DevelopmentNew York Court of Appeals · 2008
- Adler v. New York City Housing AuthorityAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
- Fermin v. New York City Housing AuthorityAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009
- Muhammad v. New York City Housing AuthorityAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.