Legal Opinion

Ruh v. Commonwealth

Court of Appeals of Kentucky

Decided January 13, 1911PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Appeal from Kenton Circuit Court (C. C. L. & E. Division).

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion op the Court by

Judge Miller

Affirming.

The appellant, Joseph L. Rnh, was indicted, tried and convicted for the offense of suffering and permitting a game of poker to he played in a house in his occupation and under his control. The indictment was found under section 1978, Kentucky Statutes, which reads as follows:

“Whoever shall suffer any game whatever at which money or property is won or lost, to be played in a house, boat, float, or on premises in his occupation or under his control, shall he fined from two hundred dollars to five hundred dollars for each offense.”

The premises in…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Miller v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1878

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Armstrong's Administrator v. Sumne & Ratterman Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1925
  2. Allen v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1917
  3. Allison v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1927

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API