Legal Opinion

Mohajer v. Commonwealth

Court of Appeals of Virginia

Decided April 15, 2003No. 1957004PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ANNUNZIATA, Judge.

Vahid Mohajer appealed his convictions by a jury of forcible sodomy and animate object penetration, contending the trial court erred (1) in allowing the Sexual Assault Nurse Examiner (“SANE”) to state an expert opinion regarding the cause of Ward’s injuries, and (2) in finding the evidence sufficient to support the convictions. A divided panel of this Court affirmed Mohajer’s convictions. We granted a petition for rehearing en banc and stayed the mandate of the panel decision. Upon rehearing en banc, we affirm the trial court.

I. BACKGROUND

Under familiar principles of…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Juares v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 1997
  2. Canipe v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 1997
  3. Sutton v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Virginia · 1985
  4. Combs v. Norfolk & Western Railway Co.Supreme Court of Virginia · 1998
  5. Velazquez v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Virginia · 2002

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Crowder v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 2003
  2. Molina v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 2006
  3. Cecelia Leigh Burnette v. Commonwealth of VirginiaCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 2012
  4. Jeffrey Dean Bondi v. Commonwealth of VirginiaCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 2019
  5. James Dillingham v. Commonwealth of VirginiaCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 2011

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API