Legal Opinion

White v. Weber

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided June 17, 2009No. 24933PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEIERHENRY, Justice.

[¶ 1.] Donald- Ray White appeals the habeas court’s decision denying his petition for habeas corpus relief on a robbery conviction in Minnehaha County. We affirm.

[¶ 2.] The underlying facts involve the robbery of a Kum & Go convenience store in Sioux Falls, South Dakota. Earlier, the State had brought an unrelated, separate charge against White for grand theft. The grand theft charge proceeded to jury trial (first trial) on August 9, 2004, and the robbery trial (second trial) was held sixteen days later on August 25, 2004. Both trials resulted in a guilty verdict. The same…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Smith v. PhillipsSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  3. Remmer v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1954
  4. Shamburger v. BehrensSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1988
  5. Steichen v. WeberSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2009

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Harris v. FlukeSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2022
  2. Berry v. FlukeDistrict Court, D. South Dakota · 2020
  3. Martinez v. Warden of South Dakota State PenitentiaryDistrict Court, D. South Dakota · 2023
  4. Quevedo v. SullivanDistrict Court, D. South Dakota · 2022
  5. State v. BerriosSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2016

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API