Russell v. Ingersoll-Rand Co.
Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
O’CONNOR, Justice.
This is an appeal from a summary judgment entered against plaintiffs. The trial court found that plaintiffs’ survival and wrongful death suits, filed three months after the deceased’s death, were barred by statutes of limitations. We affirm.
Plaintiffs are Betty Parr Russell (individually and as independent executrix of the estate of Donnon O’Neal Russell), Norma Lynn Coker, Gail Lee Harrah, Jeannie Ma rie Bourgoin, and Dennis O’Neal Russell. We refer to them as plaintiffs.
Defendants in this appeal are Ingersoll-Rand Company, McKenzie Equipment Company, Schramm, Inc.,…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Montgomery v. KennedyTexas Supreme Court · 1984
- Moreno v. Sterling Drug, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1990
- Sax v. VottelerTexas Supreme Court · 1983
- Delgado v. BurnsTexas Supreme Court · 1983
- Smith v. DavisTexas Supreme Court · 1968
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Russell v. Ingersoll-Rand Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1992
- Gerald S. Slaughter, Roma S. Bates v. Southern Talc CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1991
- Felan v. Ramos, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District1993
- Sanchez v. Brownsville Sports Center, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District2001
- Sowell v. Dresser Industries, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 9th District (Beaumont)1993
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.