Wendelken v. New York, Susquehanna & Western Railroad
Supreme Court of New Jersey
On appeal, pursuant to, the Practice act of 1912, from a judgment of the Supreme Court, affirming a judgment for plaintiff in the Hudson Circuit Court.
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered by
Parker, J.
The facts giving rise to this action, as the jury might have found them, and as for the most part conceded, will be found in the opinion in Wendelken v. Stone, decided at the present term and submitted with this case on the same brief. All questions arising in this case are disposed of in that opinion except the sole question of the responsibility of the defendant corporation in punitive damages by reason of the malicious acts of its servants under supervision of its general superintendent, named Stone. The Supreme Court *271held that there was…
2Cited by10 opinions
- Winkler v. Hartford Acc. and Ind. Co.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1961
- Cappiello v. Ragen Precision Indus., Inc.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1984
- Jorgensen v. Pennsylvania Railroad Co.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1955
- Gindin v. BaronNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1951
- Gindin v. BaronNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1951
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.