Legal Opinion

Bowles, Adm'r. v. Mittleman

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided February 17, 1948PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtBailey, J.

This action was commenced on the 14th day of December, 1944, by Chester Bowles, Administrator of the Office of Price Administration, against Harry Mittleman and Helen Eena Mittleman, doing business as Sovereign Hotel Apartments, to recover statutory damages for overceiling rents allegedly collected by defendants in violation of the provisions of the applicable rent regulations. It was brought pursuant to § 205 (e) of the Emergency Price Control Act (56 Stat. 23) as amended by 58 Stat. 632 (50 U. S. C. App. Supp. V, 901 et seq.), which provides as follows:

“If any person selling a commodity…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Fleming v. Mohawk Wrecking & Lumber Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1947
  2. United States Ex Rel. Bernardin v. ButterworthSupreme Court of the United States · 1898
  3. Fix v. Philadelphia Barge Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1934
  4. Jackson v. Duluth, Missabe & Northern Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1923
  5. Lyman Flood Prevention Ass'n ex rel. Lewis v. City of TopekaSupreme Court of Kansas · 1940

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Bowles v. WilkeCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1949

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API