Legal Opinion

Bingamon v. Curren

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided November 19, 1992No. 92-CA-31PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Fain, Presiding Judge.

Defendant-appellant Conrad A. Curren appeals from a judgment in favor of plaintiff-appellee Maynard Bingamon, executor, on Bingamon’s claim against Curren for legal malpractice. In a prior appeal, this court remanded the cause to the trial court to determine the issue of Curren’s statute of limitations defense. Bingamon v. Curren (Nov. 21, 1991), Greene App. No. 90-CA-122, unreported, 1991 WL 254649. On remand, a referee reported and recommended that the statute of limitations was not a bar .to the action, and judgment was entered accordingly.

Curren appeals, arguing that…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Viock v. Stowe-Woodward Co.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1989
  2. Miller v. MillerOhio Court of Appeals · 1960

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Lubanovich v. McGlocklinOhio Court of Appeals · 2015

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API