Legal Opinion

Viock v. Stowe-Woodward Co.

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided April 28, 1989No. E-88-30PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Handwork P.J;

This is a consolidation of three appeals from the Erie County Court of Common Pleas, originally numbered E-88-3, E-88-10, and E-88-30. Carl W. Viock and his wife brought suit against his employer, Stowe-Woodward Company (“Stowe-Woodward”) for an intentional tort. The trial court awarded the Viocks $3,500,000 in damages plus “ten percent interest from the date of the filing of this entry.” Both parties appealed and this award was modified to $3,650,000 by the court of appeals. The three appeals presently before us address only issues on calculation of interest on the $3,650,000…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Rose Powers, as Administratrix of the Goods, Chattels, and Credits of Edward J. Powers, Deceased v. The New York Central Railroad CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1958
  2. State v. Village of BrooklynOhio Supreme Court · 1943
  3. State Ex Rel. City of Elyria v. TrubeyOhio Court of Appeals · 1984
  4. State v. NorthropOhio Supreme Court · 1946

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Sharp v. Norfolk & Western Railway Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1995
  2. Sharp v. Norfolk & W. Ry. Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1995
  3. Goddard v. Children's Hospital Medical CenterOhio Court of Appeals · 2000
  4. Mayer v. MedancicOhio Supreme Court · 2009
  5. Berdyck v. ShindeOhio Court of Appeals · 1998

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API