Legal Opinion

National Abortion Federation v. Gonzales

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided January 31, 2006No. Docket No. 04-5201-CVPublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

JON O. NEWMAN, Circuit Judge.

The issue on this appeal is whether the federal statute prohibiting an abortion *281method generally medically known as dilation and extraction (“D & X”) and sometimes colloquially and in federal and state statutes called “partial birth abortion” is unconstitutional for lack of an exception permitting the procedure to be used to protect the health of a pregnant woman. The Government appeals from the August 27, 2004, judgment of the District Court for the Southern District of New York (Richard Conway Casey, District Judge) declaring the statute unconstitutional for…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Roe v. WadeSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  2. Planned Parenthood of Southeastern Pa. v. CaseySupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  3. Doe v. BoltonSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  4. Planned Parenthood of Central Missouri v. DanforthSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  5. Colautti v. FranklinSupreme Court of the United States · 1979

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Gonzales v. CarhartSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  2. United States v. ArzbergerDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2008
  3. National Abortion Federation v. GonzalesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2007
  4. Gonzales v. CarhartSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  5. Gonzales v. CarhartSupreme Court of the United States · 2007

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API