Legal Opinion

Childers v. United States

United States Court of Federal Claims

Decided July 28, 2014No. 1:07-cv-04262PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Motion for Reconsideration; Rule 59(a)(1); Fifth Amendment Taking; National Trails System Act, 16 U.S.C. § 1241 et seq.; Severance Damages; Loss of Access; Sufficient Support for Expert Opinion; Proper Scope of Expert Opinion; Fed. R. Evid. 702; Post-Trial Admission of Deposition; Fed. R. Civ. P. 32.

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION

WILLIAMS, Judge.

This matter comes before the Court on Plaintiffs’ “motion under Rule 59 to reconsider and amend opinion and order.” In this Fifth Amendment taking(s) case, the Court awarded Plaintiffs compensation in the…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Kumho Tire Co. v. CarmichaelSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
  2. United States Ex Rel. Tennessee Valley Authority v. PowelsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
  3. Michele Y. Terran, as Legal Representative of Julie F. Terran, a Minor v. Secretary of Health and Human ServicesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1999
  4. Caldwell, Iii v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2004
  5. Fontenot v. Mesa Petroleum Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1986

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Sears v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2017
  2. Sears v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2017

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API