Legal Opinion

Miller v. City of Birmingham

Alabama Court of Appeals

Decided January 7, 1969No. 6 Div. 377PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CATES, Judge.

Miller was accused of indecent exposure contrary to a Birmingham ordinance. He appealed from a conviction in the Recorder’s Court. In the Circuit Court he was tried de novo with a jury.

*629He was found guilty, fined $100 and assessed additional punishment of ninety days imprisonment in the city jail.

I

The first assignment of error complains of the circuit court’s overruling Miller’s motion to quash the City Attorney’s complaint for the trial de novo.

Complaint is made that Miller was arrested on a warrant sworn to by Donna Jean Lawson before James R. Davis described as “Magistrate of…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. McKinstry v. City of TuscaloosaSupreme Court of Alabama · 1910
  2. State v. FurmageSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1959
  3. McLosky v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1923
  4. Casteel v. City of DecaturSupreme Court of Alabama · 1926
  5. Fealy v. City of BirminghamAlabama Court of Appeals · 1916

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Clark v. City of MobileCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1978
  2. Patterson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1984
  3. Rennow v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1971
  4. Freeman v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1969

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API