Legal Opinion

Hildahl v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

Decided June 4, 1975No. F-74-164PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

BLISS, Judge:

The appellant, Gerald Hildahl, hereinafter referred to as defendant, was charged, tried before a jury and convicted in the District Court of Tulsa County for violation of 21 O.S. § 1040.51, Sale of a Magazine Which Shows Pictures or Photographs of Acts of Sexual Intercourse Between Persons. Punishment was assessed at a term of four (4) years in the state penitentiary and a fine of $15,000. From a judgment and sentence in conformance with said verdict the defendant has perfected his timely appeal.

The facts adduced at trial are as follows: On the 31st day of August, 1972,…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Roth v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  2. Miller v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  3. Hamling v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  4. Bouie v. City of ColumbiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  5. Paris Adult Theatre I v. SlatonSupreme Court of the United States · 1973

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Hunt v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1979
  2. Morrison v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1980
  3. Henderson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1985
  4. Ward v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1981
  5. May v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1990

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API