Hildahl v. State
Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
BLISS, Judge:
The appellant, Gerald Hildahl, hereinafter referred to as defendant, was charged, tried before a jury and convicted in the District Court of Tulsa County for violation of 21 O.S. § 1040.51, Sale of a Magazine Which Shows Pictures or Photographs of Acts of Sexual Intercourse Between Persons. Punishment was assessed at a term of four (4) years in the state penitentiary and a fine of $15,000. From a judgment and sentence in conformance with said verdict the defendant has perfected his timely appeal.
The facts adduced at trial are as follows: On the 31st day of August, 1972,…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Roth v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Miller v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Hamling v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Bouie v. City of ColumbiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Paris Adult Theatre I v. SlatonSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Hunt v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1979
- Morrison v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1980
- Henderson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1985
- Ward v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1981
- May v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1990
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.