Hunt v. State
Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma
1Opinion of the Court
*466OPINION
CORNISH, Presiding Judge:
The appellant was convicted of Unlawful Sale of Movies Showing Acts of Sexual Intercourse or Unnatural Copulation — 21 O.S.1971, § 1040.51 — in the District Court, Tulsa County Case No. CRF — 75-154. In her appeal she challenges both the statute under which she was charged and the sufficiency of the State’s case against her. She also complains of the information, the trial court’s refusal to suppress evidence, the instructions given to the jury, and comments made by the prosecutor.
In her first assignment of error, the appellant contends that Section 1040.51 is…
Also in this document: Concurring in part, dissenting in part.
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Furman v. GeorgiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Miller v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Hamling v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- United States v. BatchelderSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Smith v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by45 opinions
- Renfro v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1980
- Jones v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1983
- Jetton v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1981
- Dorothy Nell Hunt v. State of OklahomaCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1982
- Morrison v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1980
40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.