Legal Opinion

Davis v. City of Newark

Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

Decided August 5, 2008No. 06-4806UnpublishedCited by 31 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

ROTH, Circuit Judge:

Sharon Davis appeals the dismissal of her claims alleging racial discrimination and impermissible retaliation under Title VII and the New Jersey Law Against Discrimination. The District Court dismissed her claims pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6). We will affirm the dismissal of Davis’s claims based on a hostile work environment and racial discrimination. We will reverse the dismissal of Davis’s claim based on impermissible retaliation, and remand for further proceedings.

I. BACKGROUND

Davis filed a seven count complaint on October 28, 2004. Count…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  2. Texas Department of Community Affairs v. BurdineSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  3. Phillips v. County of AlleghenyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2008
  4. St. Mary's Honor Center v. HicksSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  5. Harris v. Forklift Systems, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by31 opinions

  1. Alers v. City of PhiladelphiaDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2013
  2. Hollinghead v. City of YorkDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 2014
  3. Nardella v. Philadelphia Gas WorksDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2014
  4. Harper v. Tyco Electronics Corp.District Court, D. Delaware · 2011
  5. ADDISON v. SIGNET JEWELERS LIMITEDDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2025

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API