Alvin Francis Ramey and Owen Leroy Linder v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
HOLMES, Circuit Judge.
' [1] In order to sustain the verdict of guilty under count one, it was not necessary to prove the substantive offenses charged under either count two or three of the indictment in this case. To be more specific, it was not necessary to prove 'that the five thousand dollars, which had been taken by fraud from the owner thereof, was in fact transported in foreign commerce pursuant to the conspiracy alleged in count one. The conspiracy to transport it having been shown by circumstantial evidence to the exclusion of every reasonable hypothesis to the contrary, it was only…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Crain v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1945
- Buchanan v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1947
3Cited by4 opinions
- Eugene Fisher Londos and Adrian Lawrence Dudley v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1957
- Commonwealth v. WhiteMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1970
- Alvin Francis Ramey and Owen Leroy Linder v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1956
- United v. MenereDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1956