Alfaro v. State
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
ROBERTS, Judge.
These appeals are from convictions of aggravated robbery. The appellants were indicted separately, but tried together for the robbery of Edward Max. They were represented at trial by the same team of attorneys. The jury found both guilty and assessed punishment in both cases at confinement for twenty years.
Although the record on appeal is not without some confusion, these appellants are now apparently represented by separate attorneys. In No. 62,708, a brief was filed in the trial court which purports to be a brief raising grounds of error for both appellants. Both names…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Harris v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Butler v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1973
- Buchanan v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1971
- Peach v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1973
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by35 opinions
- Ingham v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1984
- Huffman v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1988
- Clark v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1986
- Chambliss v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1983
- Paez v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1984
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.