Legal Opinion

Flowers v. SHENANGO SCREENPRINTING, INC.

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided December 23, 2010No. 36367PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HORTON, Justice.

This is an appeal from the Idaho Industrial Commission’s (Commission) decision affirming the determination by the Idaho Department of Labor’s (Department) appeals examiner that Shenango Sereenprinting, Inc. (Shenango) is chargeable for unemployment insurance benefits for Daniel Flowers (Flowers). Shenango appeals the Commission’s decision to not grant Shenango an evidentiary hearing or remand the matter to the appeals examiner for further development of the record and the Commission’s denial of Shenango’s request for reconsideration. We affirm.

I. FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Parker v. St. Maries PlywoodIdaho Supreme Court · 1980
  2. Rogers v. Trim HouseIdaho Supreme Court · 1979
  3. Teevan v. Office of Attorney General, Natural Resources Division, State of IdahoIdaho Supreme Court · 1997
  4. Higgins v. Larry Miller Subaru-MitsubishiIdaho Supreme Court · 2007
  5. Super Grade, Inc. v. Idaho Department of Commerce & LaborIdaho Supreme Court · 2007

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Serrano v. Four Seasons FramingIdaho Supreme Court · 2014
  2. Fonseca v. Corral Agriculture, Inc.Idaho Supreme Court · 2014
  3. Boyd-Davis v. Macomber Law, PLLCIdaho Supreme Court · 2015
  4. Roy Green v. Industrial Special IndemnityIdaho Supreme Court · 2016
  5. Hopkins v. PNEUMOTECH, INC.Idaho Supreme Court · 2012

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API