Legal Opinion

Gilbert v. Craddock

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided June 6, 1903No. 13,558PublishedCited by 23 opinions

Original proceedings in quo warranto.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Cunningham, J. :

his is an original proceeding in quo warranto to determine who is entitled to the office of mayor of Kansas City, a city of the first class having more than 50,000 inhabitants. The plaintiff was a candidate for that office at an election held April 7, ■1903, and, out of 12,986 votes cast, he received 7735, a majority of 2484. The defendant was elected mayor in April, 1901, and has served since that time. He now claims that he is entitled to continue in office because there was no warrant of law for the election of a mayor in April, 1903…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Attorney-General v. SteersSupreme Court of Missouri · 1869
  2. State ex rel. Crawford v. RobinsonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1862
  3. People ex rel. Benoit v. MillerMichigan Supreme Court · 1867
  4. State ex rel. Ackerman v. DahlWisconsin Supreme Court · 1886
  5. State ex rel. Heath v. KraftOregon Supreme Court · 1890

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. Coggins v. ElyArizona Supreme Court · 1921
  2. Utah Copper Co. v. Industrial Commission of UtahUtah Supreme Court · 1920
  3. State v. PayneCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2009
  4. State ex rel. Schenck v. Board of County CommissionersSupreme Court of Kansas · 1910
  5. Unified School District No. 501 v. BakerSupreme Court of Kansas · 2000

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API