Pearce v. Union Nat. Bank
District Court, N.D. Ohio
1Opinion of the Court
HAHN, District Judge.
The defendant, on October 22, 1928, when this cause eame on for trial, filed its motion to dismiss the cause, for the reason that the amended bill filed herein does not state facts sufficient to entitle plaintiffs to equitable relief. Prior proceedings in the case were; briefly, as follows :
Plaintiffs filed their bill September 1,1926. The defendant, on September 21, 1926, filed a motion to dismiss on the ground, among others, that plaintiffs had a plain, adequate, and complete remedy at law. -No action was taken upon this motion by the eourt, it being followed by the…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- New Orleans v. New Orleans Water Works Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1891
- American Mills Co. v. American Surety Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1922
- Tyler v. SavageSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
- Blair v. BraileyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1915
- Adams v. ClarkeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1927
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Sabine Hardwood Co. v. Houston Oil Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1937