Jordan v. Van Duzee
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Action in the municipal court of Minneapolis to recover $325, the value of a Burroughs adding machine. The answer denied specifically that defendant ever owned or sold plaintiff a Burroughs adding machine or that any adding machine was part of the property of the.Superior Electric Manufacturing Company; alleged that if the adding machine had been any part of the property of said Superior Electric Manufacturing Company at said time, it was duly reserved under the terms of the…
Read the full summary
Action in the municipal court of Minneapolis to recover $325, the value of a Burroughs adding machine. The answer denied specifically that defendant ever owned or sold plaintiff a Burroughs adding machine or that any adding machine was part of the property of the.Superior Electric Manufacturing Company; alleged that if the adding machine had been any part of the property of said Superior Electric Manufacturing Company at said time, it was duly reserved under the terms of the agreement of December 28, 1914, and was never sold to plaintiff at any time, and alleged that if plaintiff delivered…
1Opinion of the CourtBrown, C. J.
The facts in this case briefly stated are as follows: By a contract between the parties of date December 28, 1914, defendant, who was engaged in business under the name of Superior Electric Manufacturing Company, sold and delivered to plaintiff certain personal property, then being upon and within the premises and place of business of the company, and described'in the written contract of sale substantially in the following language:
All the business and good will of said Superior Electric Manufacturing Company, including all machinery, furniture, fixtures, material and equipment of said…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Bordwell v. . CollieNew York Court of Appeals · 1871
- McGiffin v. . BairdNew York Court of Appeals · 1875
- Close v. CrosslandSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1891
- Johnson v. Oehmig & WiehlSupreme Court of Alabama · 1891
- Hodges v. . Wilkinson.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1892
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Mauldin v. MilfordSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1924
- Tischer v. BardinSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1923
- Kavli v. LeifmanSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1940
- Riviera Imports, Inc. v. Anderson Used Cars, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1964
- Prosser v. BailesAlabama Court of Appeals · 1949
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.