Huckaby v. Division of Employment Security
Missouri Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
GARY D. WITT, Judge.
Timothy Huckaby appeals the decision of the Labor and Industrial Relations Commission (“Commission”) dismissing his unemployment benefits appeal because his “Application for Review” was not timely filed. For the reasons set forth herein, we affirm.
Factual Background
Huckaby filed a claim for unemployment compensation with the Division of Employment Security (“Division”). A Division deputy found that Huckaby was disqualified from benefits “because the claimant was discharged by [Truman Medical Center] on 9/26/08 for misconduct connected with work.” Specifically, it was found…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Phillips v. Clean-TechMissouri Court of Appeals · 2000
- Chase v. Baumann Property Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 2005
- Ewing v. SSM Health CareMissouri Court of Appeals · 2008
- Beebe v. NaviauxMissouri Court of Appeals · 2010
- Nettles v. Barnes-Jewish HospitalMissouri Court of Appeals · 2011
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Dana Jensen v. Division of Employment SecurityMissouri Court of Appeals · 2024
- Mary Ann Dewes v. Division of Employment SecurityMissouri Court of Appeals · 2023
- Samantha Bordas, Appellant, vs. FedEx Freight, Inc. and Division of Employment Security, Respondents.Missouri Court of Appeals · 2025