Hechinger Co. v. State's Attorney
Court of Appeals of Maryland
1ConcurrenceO’Donnell, J.
I concur with the result reached by the majority, but I would sustain the grant of injunctive relief upon the more restricted ground that the appellant, Hechinger Company, is not within the exception set forth in the Maryland Code (1957, 1971 Repl. Vol.), Art. 27, § 534 H (c) (2), in that none of the merchandise sold by it brings it within the definition of a “nurseryman” as that term is known and defined. I cannot concur that in 1968 when the General Assembly enacted that section, nor in 1969 when the “Sabbath breaking” statute was last before it, that the legislature “must have had in mind…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Town of Needham v. Winslow Nurseries, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1953
- Piekos v. BachandMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1955
- Suburbia Gardens Nursery, Inc. v. County of St. LouisSupreme Court of Missouri · 1964
- Miethke v. Pierce CountyWashington Supreme Court · 1933
- Paine v. Assessors of WestonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1937
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.