Re Neil Estate
Oregon Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtMcBRIDE, C. J.
It is first claimed that this appeal should be dismissed for the reason that Garrette M. Julien, Marie Julien, Ida Martin, John Quirk, St. Joseph’s Catholic Church of Salem, Oregon, and Patrick Ryan, who appeared to contest the identity and right of Michael O’Neill, have not been served with notice of appeal, but we hold that these parties are not *161adverse parties within the meaning of Section 550 of the Code. An adverse party, within the meaning of this section, is a party whose interest and relation to the decree appealed from is in conflict with the modification or reversal sought by the…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- French Livestock Co. v. Harney CountyOregon Supreme Court · 1899
- Watson v. Noonday Mining Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1900
3Cited by3 opinions
- Wyoming Hereford Ranch v. Hammond Packing Co.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1924
- In Re Brooks' EstateOregon Supreme Court · 1941
- In Re Estate of NeilOregon Supreme Court · 1926