Legal Opinion
National Labor Relations Board v. American Pearl Button Co.
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
Decided May 8, 1945No. 12972PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
GARDNER, Circuit Judge.
The National Labor Relations Board seeks enforcement of its order issued against respondent, American Pearl Button Company. Respondent resists enforcement, challenging its validity.
Respondent operates a pearl button factory in Washington, Iowa. The Board found that respondent had violated Section 8(1), (3) and (4) of the National Labor Relations Act, 29 U.S.C.A. §§ 158(1, 3, 4), in that it discriminated ' against certain named employees because of their membership in a union and because they had given testimony against it in a proceeding under the Act. The Board also…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Phelps Dodge Corp. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Republic Aviation Corp. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Carter Carburetor Corp. v. National Labor Relations BoardCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1944
- National Labor Relations Board v. William Davies Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1943
- American Smelting & Refining Co. v. National Labor Relations BoardCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1942
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- National Labor Relations Board v. Illinois Tool WorksCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1946
- Electri-Flex Company v. National Labor Relations BoardCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1978
- National Labor Relations Board v. Kearney & Trecker CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1956
- United Steelworkers of America v. National Labor Relations BoardCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1956
- United Steelworkers of America, CIO v. National Labor Relations Board, Nutone, Incorporated, Intervenor. National Labor Relations Board v. Nutone, Incorporated, United Steelworkers of America, Cio, IntervenorCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1957