Legal Opinion

Marland v. Gillespie

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided March 13, 1934No. 21180Published

1DissentMcNEILL, J.

I am unable to concur in the majority opinion. The deed in question is designated a general warranty deed. In the granting clause appears, in part, the following:

“That said party of the first part * * * does by these presents grant, bargain, sell and convey unto said party of the second part. * * * all of the following real estate situated in the county of Kay and Territory of Oklahoma, towit:
“A strip of land 50 feet in width ofiE the north side of the northeast quarter (-(4) etc. * * *
“The same being for a right of way for a railroad track as the survey thereof is now located, and said…

Also in this document: Opinion of the Court.

2Cases cited87 opinions

  1. Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railroad v. ChicagoSupreme Court of the United States · 1897
  2. Louisville & Nashville Railroad v. Barber Asphalt Paving Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1905
  3. Western Union Telegraph Co. v. Pennsylvania RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1904
  4. New Mexico v. United States Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1898
  5. Baltimore Shipbuilding & Dry Dock Co. v. BaltimoreSupreme Court of the United States · 1904

82 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API