Legal Opinion
Marland v. Gillespie
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided March 13, 1934No. 21180Published
1DissentMcNEILL, J.
I am unable to concur in the majority opinion. The deed in question is designated a general warranty deed. In the granting clause appears, in part, the following:
“That said party of the first part * * * does by these presents grant, bargain, sell and convey unto said party of the second part. * * * all of the following real estate situated in the county of Kay and Territory of Oklahoma, towit:
“A strip of land 50 feet in width ofiE the north side of the northeast quarter (-(4) etc. * * *
“The same being for a right of way for a railroad track as the survey thereof is now located, and said…
Also in this document: Opinion of the Court.
2Cases cited87 opinions
- Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railroad v. ChicagoSupreme Court of the United States · 1897
- Louisville & Nashville Railroad v. Barber Asphalt Paving Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1905
- Western Union Telegraph Co. v. Pennsylvania RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1904
- New Mexico v. United States Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1898
- Baltimore Shipbuilding & Dry Dock Co. v. BaltimoreSupreme Court of the United States · 1904
82 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.