Legal Opinion
Abadilla v. Precigen, Inc.
District Court, N.D. California
Decided April 8, 2021No. 5:20-cv-06936Unknown
1Opinion
1 2 3 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 4 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 5 SAN JOSE DIVISION 6 7 MARTIN JOSEPH ABADILLA, Case No. 20-cv-06936-BLF 8 Plaintiff, ORDER ON MOTIONS TO APPOINT 9 v. LEAD PLAINTIFF AND APPROVE SELECTION OF LEAD COUNSEL 10 PRECIGEN, INC., et al., [Re: ECF 11, 16, 21, 22] 11 Defendants. 12 Now before the Court are four dueling motions for appointment of lead plaintiff and 13 14 approval of selection of lead counsel. ECF 11, 16, 21, 22. Based on the reasons explained below, 15 the Court GRANTS Plaintiff Raju Shah’s motion at ECF 11 and DENIES the remaining motions 16 at ECF…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- David Hanon v. Dataproducts Corporation Jack C. DavisCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1992
- W.R. Huff Asset Management Co. v. Deloitte & Touche LLPCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2008
- Schwartz v. HarpDistrict Court, C.D. California · 1985
- Quinlan v. Koch Oil Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1994
- Petrie v. Electronic Game Card, Inc.District Court, C.D. California · 2015