Legal Opinion
Securities & Exchange Commission v. Management Dynamics, Inc.
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Decided March 18, 1975No. Nos. 450, 773, 774, 807, Dockets 74-1680, 74-1686, 74-2148, 74-1842PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
IRVING R. KAUFMAN, Chief Judge:
One indication of the scope of the securities law violations charged in this case is that eighteen defendants were made parties to this action by the Securities and Exchange Commission [SEC]. Ten defendants consented to the issuance of permanent injunctions against them prior to the entry of judgment below, and another four determined not to appeal. Each appellant was enjoined from future violations of the registration and antifraud provisions of the securities laws, §§ 5(a), 5(c) and 17(a) of the Securities Act of 1933, § 10(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of…
2Cases cited39 opinions
- United States v. W. T. Grant Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1953
- Hecht Co. v. BowlesSupreme Court of the United States · 1944
- Securities & Exchange Commission v. Capital Gains Research Bureau, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1963
- United States v. Parke, Davis & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1960
- Securities and Exchange Commission v. Manor Nursing Centers, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1972
34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Ingenito v. Bermec Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 1977
- Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 95,017 Securities and Exchange Commission v. Management Dynamics, Inc., and William N. Levy, Securities and Exchange Commission v. Management Dynamics, Inc., and Samuel D. HodgeCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1975
- Landry v. Price Waterhouse Chartered AccountantsDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1989
- McNamara v. Bre-X Minerals Ltd.District Court, E.D. Texas · 1999
- Commodities Futures Trading Commission v. Commodities Fluctuations Systems, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1984
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.