Legal Opinion

Stark v. Fry

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided July 10, 1987PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*238OPINION OF THE COURT

Dillon, P. J.

In an action by plaintiffs for specific performance of a contract to purchase real property owned by defendants, the principal issue presented on appeal is whether the exercise by the optionee’s agent of an option, granted in a written and otherwise sufficient agreement signed by all principals, is ineffective unless the agent had written authority to act on behalf of the optionee. We hold that the agent’s authority to exercise the option need not be in writing.

On January 26, 1985, the defendants and Richard A. Hutch-ens & Associates (Hutchens) executed an…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Hallock v. StateNew York Court of Appeals · 1984
  2. Sy Jack Realty Co. v. Pergament Syosset Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1971
  3. Welsh v. JakstasIllinois Supreme Court · 1948
  4. Read v. HenzelAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1979
  5. Tymon v. LinokiNew York Court of Appeals · 1965

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Kaplan v. LippmanNew York Court of Appeals · 1990
  2. Time Warner City Cable v. Adelphi UniversityAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006
  3. Ranier v. FriemanNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1996
  4. Signal Management Corp. v. LambNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1995
  5. Weissman v. AdlerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API