Legal Opinion

Jurado v. Western Gear Works

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided March 3, 1993Published

1Opinion of the Court

131 N.J. 375 (1993)

619 A.2d 1312

ALFONSO JURADO, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, AND MARLENE JURADO, HIS WIFE, PLAINTIFF,

v.

WESTERN GEAR WORKS, ORVILLE DUTRO AND SONS, BUCYRUS-ERIE CORPORATION, JOHN DOE, RICHARD ROE, ABC CORPORATION, AND XYZ CORPORATION, SAID NAMES BEING FICTITIOUS, DEFENDANTS, AND WESTERN GEAR CORPORATION AND BUCYRUS-ERIE COMPANY, DEFENDANTS-APPELLANTS.

The Supreme Court of New Jersey.

Argued October 14, 1992.

Decided March 3, 1993.

M. Christie Wise argued the cause for appellants (Bumgardner, Hardin & Ellis, attorneys; George R. Hardin, of counsel; Ms. Wise and Edward M. Suarez, Jr., on…

Also in this document: Dissent.

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Barker v. Lull Engineering Co.California Supreme Court · 1978
  2. Suter v. San Angelo Foundry & MacHine CompanySupreme Court of New Jersey · 1979
  3. Cepeda v. Cumberland Engineering Company, Inc.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1978
  4. O'BRIEN v. Muskin Corp.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1983
  5. Dewey v. R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1990

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API