Legal Opinion

Gay v. County Com'rs of Bonneville County

Idaho Court of Appeals

Decided September 21, 1982No. 13647PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BURNETT, Judge.

The issue presented is whether procedural due process was afforded in proceedings before zoning authorities, on a request to change the authorized use of a particular parcel of land. Simplot Soilbuilders, Inc., sought and obtained from Bonneville County a variance to construct a fertilizer storage and blending facility in an area zoned A-l agricultural. The owners of adjoining property, John and Janice Gay, brought this action to vacate the variance. They alleged that numerous procedural errors had infected the variance granting process, and that certain findings made by the…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Mathews v. EldridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  2. Wolff v. McDonnellSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  3. Goss v. LopezSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  4. Linkletter v. WalkerSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  5. Great Northern Railway Co. v. Sunburst Oil & Refining Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1932

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Avondale on Hayden, Inc. v. HallIdaho Court of Appeals · 1983
  2. Idaho Historic Preservation Council, Inc. v. City CouncilIdaho Supreme Court · 2000
  3. Rural Kootenai Organization, Inc. v. Board of CommissionersIdaho Supreme Court · 1999
  4. Spencer v. Kootenai CountyIdaho Supreme Court · 2008
  5. State v. TisdaleIdaho Court of Appeals · 1982

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API