Van Every v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
GARRECHT, Circuit Judge.
The question presented to this court in this petition is whether the petitioner was required to -report, as belonging to him individually, all salary received by him subsequent to a property settlement agreement dated July 6, 1935, or if such salary could be returned by the petitioner and Ellen C. Van Every on a community basis.
The facts were stipulated. The petitioner and Ellen C. Van Every were husband and wife for several years prior to 1935, and on the 8th day of July, 1935, an interlocutory judgment of divorce was entered in the Superior Court of the State of…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Lucas v. EarlSupreme Court of the United States · 1930
- Poe v. SeabornSupreme Court of the United States · 1930
- Kaltschmidt v. WeberCalifornia Supreme Court · 1904
- Wren v. WrenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893
- In re Estate of DavisCalifornia Supreme Court · 1895
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Sparkman v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1940
- Johnson v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1943
- O'Bryan v. CommissionerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1945
- Black v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1940
- Commissioner of Internal Revenue v. MillsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1950
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.