Legal Opinion

Cahill v. Cantwell

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided January 13, 1891PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Error to the district court for Greeley county. Tried below before Tiffany, J. cited: Irwin v. Nuckolls, 3 Neb., 441; People v. R. Co., 39 How. Pr. [N. Y.], 51; Gudtner r. Kilpatrick, 14 Neb., 351; 2 Herman, Estoppel, 1T79; Brooks v. Jacksonville, 1 Scam. [111.], 568; R. Co. v. Belt, 36 O. St.,- 93.

1Opinion of the CourtNorval, J.

On the 17th day of August, 1888, the defendant in error recovered a judgment against the plaintiff in error, in the county court of Greeley county, in the sum of $57.10. On the 24th day of the same month the plaintiff in error filed in said court an appeal bond, which was duly approved, and-on the. 18th’ day. of September'he'filed *159a transcript of said judgment in the.district court of Greeley county, and had his appeal docketed therein for trial.

At the October term, 1888, of the district court, on motion of the defendant in error, the appeal was dismissed for the reason that the transcript…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Stewart v. CarterNebraska Supreme Court · 1876
  2. Steele v. HaynesNebraska Supreme Court · 1886
  3. Irwin v. NuckollsNebraska Supreme Court · 1872

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Armstrong v. MayerNebraska Supreme Court · 1903
  2. Clarke Drug Co. v. BoardmanNebraska Supreme Court · 1897
  3. Jones v. DanforthNebraska Supreme Court · 1904
  4. Samuelson v. TribuneWyoming Supreme Court · 1931

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API