Legal Opinion

People v. Herbison

New York Court of Appeals

Decided October 16, 1968PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Judgment reversed and information dismissed. There was no probable cause for the arrest of defendant. His confession immediately followed this unlawful arrest, and must be considered inadmissible under the facts of this case. Had the confession been admissible, defendant’s culpability could have been deemed established by entry into the premises by his accomplices (former Penal Law, § 2, defining “ principal ”; People v. Katz, 209 N. Y. 311, 325-326; People v. Henry, 18 A D 2d 293). The People admit the insufficiency of their case.

Concur: Chief Judge Fuld and Judges Burke, Scileppi, Behgan,…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. People v. . KatzNew York Court of Appeals · 1913

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. People v. HerbisonNew York Court of Appeals · 1968

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API