Legal Opinion
Lozada-Mendoza v. State
Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District
Decided May 22, 1997No. 13-95-212-CRPublishedCited by 19 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
FEDERICO G. HINOJOSA, Jr., Justice.
Appellant, Victor Manuel Lozada-Mendo-za, waived a jury trial and entered a plea of not guilty to the offense of aggravated possession with intent to deliver a controlled substance in excess of 400 grams. The trial court found him guilty and assessed punishment at 65 years’ confinement. By three points of error, appellant contends that the trial court erred in denying his motions to suppress the evidence and confessions, and that he received ineffective assistance of counsel. We affirm.
On November 30, 1994, Department of Public Safety (DPS) Trooper…
2Cases cited35 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Jackson v. DennoSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Hernandez v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1986
- Jackson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1994
- Ex Parte WelbornCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1990
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- Moreno v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District1999
- Cerda v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District2000
- Hernandez v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District2000
- Christopher Jaroszewicz v. Texas Department of Public Safety, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)2015
- Constancio, III, Trinidad v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District2000
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.