Legal Opinion
H.E. Butt Grocery Co. v. United States
District Court, W.D. Texas
Decided February 9, 2000No. 5:98-cv-00336PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
PRADO, District Judge.
On this date the court considered Plaintiffs Motion for Reconsideration of Partial Summary Judgment, Plaintiffs Motion to Amend Complaint, and Plaintiffs Motion for Leave to Supplement Witness List, as well as Defendant’s responses to these motions. The United States has indicated that it does not oppose the Motion for Leave to Supplement Witness List to the extent that it only adds fact witnesses. After careful consideration, the Court will grant the Motion for Reconsideration in part and deny it in part, grant the Motion to Amend, and deny the Motion for Leave to…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Marian Fontenot, Etc. v. The Upjohn CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1986
- Lavespere v. Niagara Machine & Tool Works, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1990
- Knight-Ridder Newspapers, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1984
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Manor Care, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2011
- Manor Care, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2009
- O'Shaughnessy v. CommissionerCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2003
- Roger O'shaughnessy, as Tax Matters Person for Cardinal Ig Company v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, Roger O'shaughnessy, as Tax Matters Person for Cardinal Ig Company v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2003