Legal Opinion

Vann v. Kreindler

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided December 30, 1980PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Fein, J.

On December 28, 1972, plaintiff-petitioner (Vann), having been an associate with the firm of Kreindler, Relkin, Olick & Goldberg (KROG) for one and one-half years, entered into a written agreement making Vann a “partner *256in the firm” with compensation to be fixed by the management committee as a percentage of the firm’s net fees with a right to draw no less than $2,000 a month on account of such compensation. Vann was not to “incur or make any financial obligations or commitments in the firm’s name without prior approval of the Management Committee” ; he was…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Matter of Lipman (Haeuser Shellac Co.)New York Court of Appeals · 1942
  2. In re the Arbitration between Marlene Industries Corp. & Carnac Textiles, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1978
  3. Matter of Lehman v. OstrovskyNew York Court of Appeals · 1934
  4. Schubtex, Inc. v. Allen Snyder, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1979
  5. In re the Arbitration between Riccardi & Modern Silver Linen Supply Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1974

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Rodgers v. LoganAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1986
  2. Brown v. V&R Advertising, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1985
  3. In Re C-TC 9th Avenue PartnershipUnited States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. New York · 1995
  4. Intercontinental Packaging Co. v. China National Cereals, Oils & Foodstuffs Import & Export Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1990
  5. Vollgraff v. BlockNew York Supreme Court · 1982

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API